Another climate summitI called the results of the highly praised, universally acclaimed climate summit in Paris "the emperor's new clothes". This time in Brazil, nothing is to be expected again.It's that time again. Thousands of busybodies are flying to the next climate summit, this time to Brazil. 1992 was just the first few months of the "GEMINI habitable solar power plant" project and I was planning to somehow make it to the first climate summit in Rio. For the 2010 climate summit, I brought the PEGE Manifesto. Can also be found in my book Calculation ERROR from page 272 to 285. I had actually planned to present my book "Calculation ERROR" at the 2013 climate summit in Warsaw. I quickly realized that all the self-proclaimed climate protectors were only interested in complaining and not in finding solutions. The saying "Jumped as a tiger, landed as a bedside rug" fits my plans at the time. In the end, I was delighted to have raised the money to print 3,000 books.
That was the title of my Newsletter of December 13, 2015: Saturday evening, the lying media are overflowing with adulation of the "historic" climate agreement, the "miracle of Paris". It is reminiscent of the scene where the emperor presents his new clothes, walks around naked, but the professional liars report on the incredible beauty of his new clothes.
Time and again, I have proposed a revenue-neutral restructuring of the tax system. In 2009, the first proposal was €100 per tonne of CO2. In 2016 at Investment avalanche, trigger economic boom it was €200 per tonne. I kept hearing concerns about whether the economy could withstand this. Russian gas via the pipeline is cheaper and causes less CO2 emissions than liquefying US fracking gas and then transporting it to Germany at great expense. Due to the costly transportation, US fracked gas causes 67% more CO2 emissions equivalent than Russian gas from the pipeline. Given the average price difference, Russian gas from the pipeline would cost € 440 per tonne of CO2, the same as US fracking gas by ship without the CO2 tax. The price of US fracked gas by ship therefore corresponds to a NON revenue-neutral CO2 tax of € 440 per ton on Russian gas via pipeline.
The expansion of the railroad in the 19th century with 7% GDP also had military motives: If the neighbor builds a railroad, it could throw its army to the border before you have a chance to react. But the main benefit was for the economy. A bit of history: the largest military operation involving the railroad began in mid-March 1945, when the USSR deployed massive numbers of troops to the Far East on the border of Manchuria, which had been conquered by Japan, even before the surrender of Nazi Germany. From March to the beginning of August 1945, over 1.5 million soldiers, over 5,000 tanks and almost 4,000 aircraft were transported thousands of kilometers to the east. The Japanese, who were only lightly armed and only wanted to control conquered territories, had absolutely nothing to oppose the Red Army and its T-34 tanks, which were experienced in fighting against Nazi Germany. Historians argue whether the two atomic bombs or the sweeping away of the Japanese armed forces in Manchuria (north-eastern China) contributed more to Japan's surrender. This 7% GDP for the construction of the railroad was invested by economically healthy countries in a project with considerable economic benefits. Today, however, NATO wants economically sick countries to waste 5% GDP pointlessly on armaments. The theory of 3% GDP new government debt is based on constant economic growth. Debt is constantly rising, but the economy is growing and therefore debt growth is not a problem. It only becomes stupid when the credit rating is lowered. It only gets stupid when the GDP doesn't match reality. New jobs in administration, new jobs that have to deal with the proliferating jungle of regulations, but rapid job cuts in production. What will Germany do if Volkswagen's credit rating is lowered? After all, the debt is €219 billion. Even more debt to save Volkswagen? Here are the debts in Germany:
I really enjoyed going to the DENA Energy Transition Congress in Berlin. The search for the one righteous decision-maker who wants to support a cost-optimized energy transition. Lot searched in vain for 10 righteous people in Sodom and Gomorrah, I would have been happy with just one righteous decision-maker. Tuesday, 10:30 I saw a lecture announced: We have to talk about the defense case, 11:05 to 12:00. There were a few people standing outside the hall, including an officer. What would have been appropriate attire for the occasion? The dress uniform, of course. What was the officer wearing? Camouflage fatigues. This is supposed to symbolize that the defense case is so close that you want to save yourself the time to change from dress uniform to camouflage. I confronted the group with the statement: Attack Germany? That would be as stupid as accepting an inheritance where there are 1 million assets against 10 million debts. Of course, they could not come up with anything to refute this thesis: "We disagree". I gave historical examples: "I'm not a historian". What else can you say? Those who learn nothing from history are condemned to repeat it. Those who learn from history must watch helplessly as those unwilling to learn repeat history. They didn't engage in any discussion with me, they simply threw me out. I then discussed this topic with Grok. Here's this must-read discussion with Grok
He blocked me on X years ago. After all, I questioned the infallibility of this self-proclaimed solar pope. Of course, he has consistently refused to discuss my solutions to the energy transition. Today I saw one of his latest posts on X because someone shared it as a picture. 
What else can you say?
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that there is no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. The share price is now lifted towards our targets at each milestone. These milestones can happen in all areas: Financial, new shareholders, new opportunities to attract new shareholders. Contracts to build the prototype, more houses and settlements. Cooperations for realization. Purchase, arrival and testing of important technical components. |
