Cancel Culture is a destructive cultural breakHow can such an extremely destructive cultural break come about? Can this be of natural origin or has it been carefully designed and artificially established?Europe became great in the Age of Enlightenment. There was Europe on one side and North Africa and the Middle East on the other. The whole development was pretty much the same until the Age of Enlightenment. Then an increasingly dramatic difference began. The recipe for success of free speech, being able to discuss anything, freedom of expression. This promoted innovation and economic growth. The rulers of the time were big fans of freedom of expression. Voltaire described the Russian Tsarina as the brightest star of the North and the Tsarina tried to incorporate Voltaire's concepts into her government program. As late as 1920, even the communist politician Rosa Luxemburg was very much in favor of freedom of expression: "Freedom is always freedom of dissent." This means that even in extreme political directions, people continued to adhere to the West's recipe for success. The victory of the West over the Eastern Bloc was presented as a victory of freedom of expression over censorship. In the 1990s, the propaganda was repeated again and again: China will fail because of censorship, the West is superior because of its freedom of expression.
Then the cancel culture suddenly became stronger and stronger. This is the complete opposite of freedom of expression. This is an extreme cultural break with the West's central recipe for success. Cancel culture is comparable to the Inquisition of the Middle Ages. Some mad inquisitor could interpret practically any opinion as an attack on the holy Roman Catholic Church, with catastrophic consequences for the victims. How can such a cultural break come about?
On February 8, 2025, I came across a page on Facebook, I won't mention the exact name so as not to expose the person who is seriously ill with the woke virus. Let's call this page "I don't like fossil fuels". I just entered this on Facebook, the real name is sufficiently disguised with this paraphrase. I called them immediately and had a very positive conversation lasting almost 2 hours about my project and finding investors. After my return from Banská Bystrica, I tried to inform him of the dramatic news on February 24. "This is Max Mustermann's voicemail, please leave a message and I'll get back to you as soon as possible." I then called him almost every working day. At first I thought he was on vacation or in hospital. After about a month, the first suspicion of cancel culture arose. The suspicion of cancel culture became more and more confirmed and my attempts to call him were more and more in the direction of behavioral research: How far does cancel culture go? Then I started asking "What happened to Max Mustermann? I haven't been able to reach him since February." Finally, after about ninety attempts to call and about twenty postings, I got an email: Please refrain from any contact attempts and posts/comments on my portals. You have supported AfD in relation to electromobility and have no interest in communicating with you. Copied from the e-mail, type error not corrected. So you're on the phone with someone for almost 2 hours and at some point it clicks in your head "Oh, that's an enemy, I'm not allowed to talk to them." Of course I talk to the AfD about a viable energy transition and real climate protection. Of course I talk to EIKE about this topic and produce articles like this. That's what I call the art of communication. I talk to everyone about these issues, even Greens. The cancel culture indoctrinated, on the other hand, call it: he communicates with enemies, therefore I am no longer allowed to communicate with him.
How can such an extremely destructive cultural break come about? Can this be of natural origin or has it been carefully designed and artificially established? Let's think back to the Stuxnet virus: uranium enrichment plants in Iran destroyed themselves by running at too high a speed. The virus caused the plants to self-destruct. Can you wreak similar havoc on a civilization by promoting completely insane ideas intensely enough? I see cancel culture as part of the destructive mechanism of the woke virus: a society becomes deeply divided because one part refuses to communicate with those who think differently. Not only that, but there is a systematic fear of not communicating with the wrong person, because otherwise you will also be canceled. This creates an environment of fear, as was once the case during the Inquisition or, more recently, under Stalin. That's as crazy as increasing the speed of a gas centrifuge until it tears apart. The gas centrifuge is innocent, it was infected by a virus. This Max Mustermann is also innocent, the woke virus has destroyed his ability to think.
At the beginning I mentioned the age-old propaganda "China will fail because of censorship, the West is superior because of its freedom of expression." The propaganda was right about the importance of freedom of expression: The West is failing because it has replaced freedom of expression with cancel culture in an extreme cultural rupture. In China, on the other hand, the age of enlightenment prevails: everything can be discussed there. I tested it myself: On SCMP.com (South China Morning Post) you can discuss everything freely.
I have on ImmobilienScout24.at searched for properties of 350 m² or more. There are 25 entries on each results page. I looked through the first 19 pages and found 55 suitable plots. The selection criteria were suitable for residential construction and under €200 per square meter. Some were plots of up to 6,500 m², which are already suitable for 10 houses. Only one was in the federal state of Salzburg, none in Tyrol or Vorarlberg. So almost only Upper Austria, Lower Austria, Burgenland, Styria and Carinthia. The apartments range in size from 56 m², suitable for a retired couple, to 118 m² for a large family. With 2 to 4 rooms there are 56 m² to 97 m². With 4 to 6 rooms there are 89 m² to 118 m². The houses themselves have between 33 kW and 55 kW of photovoltaics. If the prototype can be financed quickly now, it will be possible to compensate for the enormous delay caused by the monkey business with the rare lizards: Prototype at the end of 2025, series production from fall 2026. A simple calculation example: What is a share worth if a company value of 300 million is divided into 150,000 shares?
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, is a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. A new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. The share price is now lifted towards our targets at each milestone. These milestones can happen in all areas: Financial, new shareholders, new opportunities to attract new shareholders. Contracts to build the prototype, more houses and settlements. Cooperations for realization. Purchase, arrival and testing of important technical components. |
