New gas-fired power plants needed - progress in the projectFederal Economics Minister Reiche urges the construction of new gas-fired power plants. She is calling for a reality check on the energy transition. That's what I've been calling for for decades.Again and again to demonstrate the drastic difference in thinking between Western environmental fuzzies and China. Electric mobility was first mentioned in a Chinese five-year plan in 1991. The idea behind it was that in order for a person to travel 100 km on a motorized two-wheeler, either 4 liters of crude oil must be imported or 1 kg of domestic coal must be converted into electricity. The petrol moped always remains a petrol moped, whereas the electric moped runs on any type of electricity, whether coal, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind or solar. That is pragmatism, tackling a problem step by step, that is Confucianism. 1994 Simson developed an electric scooter. Technical level China 2004. The irrational behavior of Western environmental fuzzies: keep quiet! You can only think of such things when the electricity comes from 100% renewable energy! There are two things the irrational Western environmental fuzzies have not considered:
In September 2014, it was claimed that we won't need electricity storage for the energy transition for another 20 years. The Federal Network Agency's approved scenario framework included a guaranteed power outage on cold, windless nights. But then came the headline on May 9: Federal Economics Minister Reiche urges the construction of new gas-fired power plants. She is calling for a reality check on the energy transition. This is what I have been calling for for decades: A reality check on the energy transition! Anyone who calls for this is immediately seen as an enemy. How can anyone doubt that solar, wind, very few gas-fired power plants and batteries in homeopathic doses are completely sufficient?
Of course, gas-fired power plants should not and cannot run on natural gas forever. The following options are available to change this:
The next question is where production takes place: Centralized or decentralized is the question here: centralized means ample grid expansion to get decentrally generated solar power to the Power to X plants. Decentralized means transporting the decentrally generated energy source to central power plants. Why centralized power plants? Because of the higher efficiency. Closer to the equator, where much less summer/winter balancing is required, the cost of an electricity grid can neutralize the advantage of the higher efficiency of large central power plants. If the company AIRCELA succeeds in realizing its product, then every GEMINI next generation house could have such a device and every few months a truck picks up the methanol. Is this cheaper than a major expansion of the electricity grid to transport the electricity to central Power to X plants? Hydrogen is completely unsuitable for the scenario of decentralized production of the energy source, methane is suitable to a limited extent and methanol is by far the simplest. That would be an introduction to the complexity of this topic. It's not just about an ideal scenario, but also about the decades until this ideal scenario can be achieved. This should have been addressed at least 15 years ago, when the price of photovoltaics plummeted. What has been done instead can only be described as an extreme act of sabotage against the energy transition. The USSR lost a quarter of a century in agricultural science because of Lysenko. Lysenko's idea of endearing himself to Stalin by inventing a socialist agricultural science triggered this catastrophe. Under these circumstances, I could only publish on EIKE.
I have on ImmobilienScout24.at searched for properties of 350 m² or more. There are 25 entries on each results page. I looked through the first 19 pages and found 55 suitable plots. The selection criteria were suitable for residential construction and under €200 per square meter. Some were plots of up to 6,500 m², which are already suitable for 10 houses. Only one was in the federal state of Salzburg, none in Tyrol or Vorarlberg. So almost only Upper Austria, Lower Austria, Burgenland, Styria and Carinthia. The apartments range in size from 56 m², suitable for a retired couple, to 118 m² for a large family. With 2 to 4 rooms there are 56 m² to 97 m². With 4 to 6 rooms there are 89 m² to 118 m². The houses themselves have between 33 kW and 55 kW of photovoltaics. If the prototype can be financed quickly now, it will be possible to compensate for the enormous delay caused by the monkey business with the rare lizards: Prototype at the end of 2025, series production from fall 2026. A simple calculation example: What is a share worth if a company value of 300 million is divided into 150,000 shares?
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. A new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. The share price is now lifted towards our targets at each milestone. These milestones can happen in all areas: Financial, new shareholders, new opportunities to attract new shareholders. Contracts to build the prototype, more houses and settlements. Cooperations for realization. Purchase, arrival and testing of important technical components. |
