April and May with negative energy price for electricityBut then the grid fees and levies hit: €2.58 of €112.60 for 702.618 kWh goes to Spotty Energie and €110.02 to grid fees and levies.
I achieved a negative working price for electricity in April and May. This will probably also be the case in June. Nevertheless, in April I had to pay €0.97 for 341.344 kWh to the electricity trader Spotty Energie. The handling fee per kWh and the basic fee were added to the negative working price. 
Very similar in May: The electricity trader charges €1.61 for 360.824 kWh. But then the grid fees and levies hit: of €112.60 for 702.618 kWh, €2.58 goes to Spotty Energie and €110.02 to grid fees and levies. This is a grotesque imbalance between electricity costs and grid fees: Grid fees and charges are over 42 times greater than the bill from the electricity retailer. 
Despite these extreme grid fees, I only get 16 cents/kWh for April and May. This will probably go up to 28 cents/kWh in winter. The prototype planned in Unken will achieve an annual yield of 43,000 kWh. Not everyone optimizes their electricity purchases as much as I do. I therefore calculate 7,000 kWh at 30 cents savings through self-supply and 36,000 kWh at 10 cents as revenue from the sale of electricity: that's €5,700 per year. The situation in Hungary would be completely different: In the Budapest area 47,000 kWh annual yield. There, the private end customer price is capped at 10 cents, so only €700 savings, but significantly higher spot market prices. 40,000 kWh at 16 cents is €6,400. Together with the €700 for self-supply, that's €7,100 per year.
The Democratic politician Melissa Hortman was shot dead. The reporting on this is extremely varied. In German-speaking countries, for example, there is no mention of the fact that Melissa Hortman voted against the Democrats and with the Republicans in a vote on health insurance for illegal immigrants. This is a very crucial detail after all. There's also a video where Melissa Hortman looks very nervous and distressed about having voted with the Republicans against health insurance for illegal immigrants. Like she's expecting to be punished. Elon Musk posts about this on X: The far left is murderously violent
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. A new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. The share price is now lifted towards our targets at each milestone. These milestones can happen in all areas: Financial, new shareholders, new opportunities to attract new shareholders. Contracts to build the prototype, more houses and settlements. Cooperations for realization. Purchase, arrival and testing of important technical components. |
