The Inquisition then and Cancel culture today"Net zero emissions and everything will be fine" has long since become as unscientific as "The sun revolves around the earth". But Inquisition sticks to the dogma.The value of an AG is shares multiplied by the share price. 102,344 shares times €5 are €511,720. But Grok, X's artificial intelligence, sees the value as between €10 million and €50 million. How does this difference come about? Grok was socialized in the USA. The land of venture capitalism. The idea of venture capitalism is to invest in 10 great ideas. The venture capitalist hopes for a global success, five companies that do quite well and accepts four flops. What was it like when I founded my AG? In the many years of my work, I made around 3,500 German and 3,500 English contacts. I made a list of 250 of them, 50 of whom paid in by the time the company was founded. It was clear from the outset that there was no one who could say "The idea is great, I'm in with a million". The strategy was therefore to create new advertising material in order to be able to convince more investors and make a convincing appearance on all those platforms that deal with the financing of new ideas. Potemkin villages look great from a distance, but only until you look behind the facades and there is absolutely nothing there. That's how it is with all these platforms and TV shows.
For decades, climate activists have been busy pretending to have a solution: "Net zero emissions and everything will be fine again". The strategy for net zero emissions: make energy more expensive, drive out industry, impoverish people. I think the standard of living should be measured among the poorest 20%, because the richest 80% are better off. Grok responds to the development of the standard of living of the poorest 20% in Germany: "The poorest 20% of the population in Germany are confronted with a stagnating or declining standard of living, as the rising costs of housing and living outstrip income growth and social benefits. "Net zero emissions and everything will be fine" has long since become as unscientific as "The sun revolves around the earth". While only a few people were affected by the correction of "The sun revolves around the earth", the correction of "Net zero emissions and everything will be fine again" is about our survival. First of all, our economic survival, our standard of living. Later, our survival as humanity.
Who fought against new ideas about the earth, moon, sun and planets in the Middle Ages: the Inquisition. Today, the Inquisition has an even stronger successor organization: the Cancel Culture. Havard was a US university known for freedom of expression. The new Inquisition has smashed that completely. Here is an answer from Google: Harvard University scored 0 out of 100 in the 2025 university free speech rankings published by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). This is the lowest possible score Harvard has received for the second year in a row, bringing it to the bottom of the list. This suggests that the protection and promotion of free speech on campus is poor.
Galileo Galilei did not want to become a revolutionary. He only looked through a telescope and reported his observations. The Inquisition strictly refused to look through the telescope. That's right, I didn't want to become a revolutionary, I just analyzed publicly available data and used it to develop new approaches to the energy transition and climate protection. The inquisition strictly refuses to look at my new approaches to the energy transition and climate protection. For this new inquisition, global prosperity and planetary clean-up are just as terrible as the sight of Jupiter with its orbiting moons was back then: a shattering of strictly believed dogmas. Here are two reactions to my last newsletter:
> > I subscribe to news, It's as clear as day, Capitalism is evil, Public limited company is evil, Single-family homes are evil, Grok and X are evil, real solutions for the energy transition are evil, real solutions to climate change are evil, Improvements for Africa are bad, then no more refugees would come.
My first contact with the head of this "climate research institute" was in October 2013, when I asked him to review my book "Calculation ERROR". > > I would like to unsubscribe from the news. It's as clear as day. These institutions want to use the fairy tale "Net zero emissions and everything will be fine again" of humanity, to do something about climate change. This is to be continued for as long as possible, until it is too late, preventing Effective climate protection measures leads to the decline of humanity. I will point this out again and again, how anti-scientific the assertion "Net zero emissions and everything will be fine again" is.
Investing in such a terrible situation? Do we still believe today that the sun orbits the earth? No, the inquisition was overcome back then. Building the prototype and marketing it worldwide could shatter the destructive idea of "net zero emissions and everything will be fine" and finally lead to a genuine energy transition. A nice side effect for all those who invest: an extreme increase in the value of the share.
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 100 times or 1000 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, is a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. A new shareholder said "Me with my very modest investment", but €400 times €1,000 is also €400,000 for all investments up to the creation of the prototype. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. The share price is now lifted towards our targets at each milestone. These milestones can happen in all areas: Financial, new shareholders, new opportunities to attract new shareholders. Contracts to build the prototype, more houses and settlements. Cooperations for realization. Purchase, arrival and testing of important technical components. |
