Growing difference between rich and poor countriesThere is so much development aid and yet the difference is growing. Here is a statistic with GDP per inhabitant. 
You would expect the rich countries to reach saturation point. You would expect the differences to become smaller as a result. There is domestic value creation in every country, but imports can only be paid for with the proceeds of exports. Two basic things are living and working at tolerable temperatures and transportation and mobility. In the Philippines, for example, an enormous amount of energy has to be imported for the air conditioning alone, because between tropical heat and a much too cold 20° C in the interior there is only single-pane glass. 30,000 kWh/a just for the air conditioning - I could drive 200,000 km a year with that. Have you ever tried to be properly productive at 35°? That's why there is the assumption that Singapore's success is based on air conditioning: more productivity despite the tropical heat. 79% of electricity in the Philippines is generated using imported fossil fuels. In the case of oil, a lot of refined products are imported. This means that the two basic things of living and working at tolerable temperatures and transportation and mobility require an exceptionally high level of imports. Only a few can therefore afford an air-conditioned house and a car. The crazy electricity consumption is €6,000 per year. For 20,000 km per year, we can assume €1,500 for gasoline. That makes €150,000 in energy costs over 20 years. It is much cheaper to import electric cars, photovoltaics, batteries, proper windows and thermal insulation. Domestic value creation through house renovation and decent new buildings instead of enormous energy imports. I tried to convey this in 2011 after receiving the Gusi Peace Prize. I would like to convey this as soon as we are in a position to sell GEMINI houses.
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that there is no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2025 compared to 2005, extrapolated to 2045, is a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said, "Me with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
The situation has changed fundamentally since this company visited Slovakia. Necessary investment volume reduced by around 90%. Time to marketable product shortened by around one year. The 90% reduction in investment volume also means that each shareholder has significantly more shares. |
