Climate researchers not the least bit interested in climate protectionThese so-called “climate researchers” can make completely unrealistic claims. But they don't like to hear concrete, feasible proposals at all.One so-called "climate researcher" made demands. I found out about this on January 31, 2025 and called him. The conversation lasted just over 7 minutes.
But on Monday, February 10, to my great astonishment, I received the cancellation. So I wrote somewhat indignantly: Every person who [ ] has no plan for a planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 [ ] does not support a plan for a planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 [ ] no plan for a planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 at least demands is a climate change trivializer for me. I would have expected support from you and not such rejection. The answer: “I haven't subscribed to the newsletter”.
Making completely unrealistic claims, painting the apocalypse on the wall, that's what these so-called “climate researchers” can do. But they don't like to hear concrete, realizable suggestions at all. Even on the phone, he seemed bored and unwilling. Why is this typical of “climate researchers”? I think hundreds, if not thousands, of doctoral theses will be written about this in forensic psychiatry in the future. I am not a trained profiler who can put himself in the mind of a criminal. So I can only assume that a self-proclaimed elite sees people as pests, and that you are the only exception because you are dedicated to pest control.
They started making demands decades ago: Save Restrict Renounce. They erected a large stone monument that read “Reduce humanity to 500 million” in 8 languages. Unfortunately, we have to assume that sayings such as “Healthy planets have no people” are meant very seriously by these misanthropes. 
For many decades, global production of photovoltaics has doubled roughly every three years. We are still 5 doublings away from sufficient global production. But even then, a sufficient quantity must first be produced. At present, just over 1% of the required photovoltaics is installed worldwide. In Germany, it is 6% of the required amount. The necessary equipment with batteries for day/night balancing is practically non-existent. It is therefore quite clear that the reduction in emissions expressed in the graph cannot be achieved through renewable energy, but only through the total destruction of the economy, of humanity. You drive people mad with graphics like these, make them so crazy that victims of this madness want to stick to the streets or remain childless because children are supposed to be so harmful to the climate. There were certainly similar graphs at the headquarters of the US Bomber Command and at Bomber Harris, but with the heading “Reduction of German industrial capacity by our bombing”. Down to 0 from 1942 to 1945. The message of this graphic is: “Commit suicide or you will die”. Science is the careful modulation of scenarios as to how the climate crisis can be overcome technically, economically and socially. I have been working on this since 1991. This graphic, on the other hand, which is central to the creed of so-called “climate researchers”, is an unscientific, inhuman work of art.
There is as much difference between this plan and the enemy's plan as there is between heaven and hell. I want worldwide prosperity, heaven on earth so to speak, the others want to create hell on earth.
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said, “Me with my very modest investment”, but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
My studies on off-grid fast-charging settlements have already resulted in initial contact and a video conference with the CEO of a major African company. The most important statements: “There are about 2 million homes missing” and “Solar-powered cement factories are a fascinating new idea”. There are several chances of an event that could lead to a jump in the share price. At today's share price, € 2 million would be 10,000 packages at € 200 and 300,000 shares for the buyer. However, if these € 2 million are only worth 20% of the AG, this would logically result in a very significant jump in the share price. |
