Simple rules to shape the future wellFreedom of expression in the West was abused by a small, extremely aggressive group. This group established itself as the 4th power in the state: the inquisition of cancel culture.
This battle has been fought before, and freedom of expression has always won. There can be two reasons for restricting opinions: The possibilities for dissemination are not available or dissemination is restricted by censorship. With the invention of the printing press in 1450, Gutenberg significantly improved the possibility of disseminating opinions. The spread of the printing press was very different in different cultures and contributed to the fact that these cultures developed very differently. Europe made intensive use of the printing press. The consequences of this were the Age of Enlightenment from 1650 to 1800 and the first industrial revolution from 1800 onwards. The Arab cultural area only made very limited use of the printing press. This is one of the main reasons why the European and Arab cultural areas have developed so far apart economically. Another major duel at the time was the free West versus the Eastern Bloc. Centralized opinion control was part of the problem that led to the decline of the Eastern Bloc. Less communication, less economic development.
Freedom of expression in the West was abused by a small, extremely aggressive group. This group established itself as the 4th power in the state: the inquisition of cancel culture. Many existences were destroyed for things that should never be a criminal offence in a civilized country. But this small, extremely aggressive group knew only one verdict: destruction of livelihoods. Instead of stopping this extremely aggressive group immediately, people got used to it, adopted their ways of acting and used the same methods against those who thought differently. Ordinary citizens became more and more afraid and felt compelled to act like this inquisition so as not to be suspected of collaborating with wrong-thinkers. The best example is my blocking and deletion of all my postings in the photovoltaic forum. Simple citizens, of course, but they were terrified of being seen as collaborating with a wrong-thinker if they didn't take action against me. The decline of the West began with this rampant madness. After the successes of this small, extremely aggressive group, other groups adopted their methods, because it seemed so easy and comfortable not to have to think about arguments in a discussion, but simply to put down the opponent. Winning no longer required superior intelligence and knowledge, but only the will to aggression to eliminate the opponent. This marked the beginning of an unprecedented decline in politics and science. The system favored the aggressive ideologues and dogmatists and disadvantaged the intelligent, who had painstakingly acquired a great deal of knowledge. The best example of this is 2014's "We don't need electricity storage for the energy transition for another 20 years" and other insane campaigns.
There were intelligent, well-educated people at the levers of the GDR's planned economy who made decisions as best they could within the framework of the Eastern Bloc's doctrine of action. Of course there were rope teams, but even rope teams had to be concerned about quality and would never have dared to elevate a babbling dogmatist to a position of responsibility. System people, but system people with a connection to reality. Systemites who were able to do a lot, but were inferior to a better system, the free market economy. The triumph of crazy ideologues and dogmatists without any connection to reality is what makes the difference in the decline of the GDR and Germany. Another coal-fired power plant has just been shut down. It was operating at full load during the last dark doldrums and will be absent during the next dark doldrums. The patience of some neighboring countries regarding electricity exports to Germany is exhausted.
Here again a video recommendation: Prof. Dr. Christian Rieck: Elon Musk shakes up Germany: Interference, freedom of expression and platform regulation. It is not possible to stop the decline as long as the methods of cancel culture, the refusal to discuss, the firewall, can be applied with even small successes. Unscientific nonsense must be dealt with. This is only possible if the miracle weapon of cancel culture becomes a self-destructive pipe burst. There is so much nonsense to work through, from the 72 genders to the approved scenario framework of the Federal Network Agency.
This is after curtailment. As is well known, curtailment is the only way to maintain the electricity grid when grid-interruptor systems produce too much. A direct consequence of the storage-less design. Here to the complete discussion on X. 
Offshore wind has not even reached 3000 full load hours in the last 4 years. This is despite the fact that they are advertised as 4000 and sometimes even 4500. This is due to curtailments and the reduction in wind speed by many turbines. Just 7% less wind speed leads to 20% less yield. Here is a study how many wind turbines reduce wind speed by 47%. While this may be great for hurricane protection, it would reduce the yield by 85%. For example, 85% less yield would be only 3 GWh instead of 20 GWh. Onshore wind is stagnating in terms of full load hours. This is despite repowering, which means, for example, that 20 old 500 kW wind turbines are being replaced by 4 5 MW turbines. Twice the maximum output and many more full-load hours. Despite the fact that new turbines are much larger and taller and are therefore advertised as having more full-load hours. But wind turbines are first installed where there is the most wind. If all the good locations are occupied, then wind turbines must also be installed in increasingly unfavorable areas. It would therefore be very interesting to have statistics on the full load hours of newly erected wind turbines.
How do you get such facts across to a dogmatist who has the power to destroy livelihoods and immediately shouts "climate change denier"? Immeasurable damage has already been done to the energy transition in Germany, Elon Musk therefore came to the same conclusion as I did: political forces in favour of freedom of opinion should be supported, with whom we can then have a sensible discussion about a cost-optimized, functional energy transition. The alternative is to continue as before, until the big blackout, because neighboring countries stop exporting electricity to Germany during a dark doldrums.
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said, "Me with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
My studies on off-grid fast-charging settlements have already resulted in initial contact and a video conference with the CEO of a major African company. The most important statements: "There are about 2 million homes missing" and "Solar-powered cement factories are a fascinating new idea". Initial negotiations have been held with two financing platforms. There are several chances of an event that could lead to a jump in the share price. At today's share price, € 2 million would be 10,000 packages at € 200 and 300,000 shares for the buyer. However, if these € 2 million are only worth 20% of the AG, this would logically result in a very significant jump in the share price. |
